Monday, March 14, 2016

Hyphens, Quotations and Blots Upon History


Service and Disservice is my e-book about the Canadian Suffragists and their involvement in the War Time Elections Act of 1917.

It's a work of fiction. I make up some things and, in places, I fill in the blanks. The book, however, is based on a great deal of research and contains many quotations - and it brings up many very relevant questions related to the past and present.

I notice that on Wikipedia, the War Time Elections Act is written Wartime Elections Act. I chose to write it as it was written back then.

Indeed, the Liberal Party of Canada pamphet, rebuking the Act, had it written in two ways, War Time Elections Act and War-Time Elections Act.

I know for a fact that compound words start out separate and then they are hyphenated and then made into one word: world wide, world-wide, worldwide.


Here's a bit from that document, available on Archive.org.

There's nothing new about election fixing. Bernie Sanders, just last week, said it happened in Ohio.

A Blot Upon History (If the War Time Elections Act was indeed a Blot Upon History, it is a blot that has been white-washed, or is it whitewashed.


"In view of events that happened subsequently it is instructive to read what 
was said about the War-Time Elections Act by different members of Parliament during its passage through the House of Commons in 1917. Here are a 
few extracts from the Hansard: — 

F. B. Carvell : — Page 5699. — The Government are disfranchising Austrians, 
Germans, British subjects; they are disfranchising women, in fact it seems to me 
that they are disfranchising any one who they think will vote Liberal. 

A. K. McLean: — Page 5596 — The Bill before the House proposes to dis- 
franchise arbitrarily a portion of the people of this country. This legislation 
is objectionable in principle, and I deny that there is anything in the world 
to justify its introduction or its enactment. A proper regard for the future 
of this country and for our good name among the nations and peoples of the 
world compel one to oppose the measure. It is not founded upon any principle 
of a substantial character. I maintain that history will adjudge the act con- 
templated by this bill as a blot upon our national career. And unfortunately, 
it comes at a time when we are writing glorious and imperishable pages of our 
history, which will be the future epics of this young nation. 

Geo. E. McCraney, M.P. — Page 5563 — I do feel, however, that in placing 
this measure of disfranchisement before parliament — a measure against which 
we protest; a measure in respect of which we must accuse the Government of 
the most partisan conduct — the Government by their own Act are throwing 
the gravest doubt upon the judgment that we have exercised in supporting their 
measure of conscription. * 

W. A. Buchanan, M.P. — Page 5581 — We left our party and took the 
position we did for the national advantage, because we looked upon the measure 
as a war measure. The Government is adopting the present measure, not as a 
war measure and not for the National advantage, but for the advantage of the 
party they represent. I would like to say that, if we are going to build up a 
united Canada, if we are going to bring people into this country and promise 
them the rights of citizenship, we must adhere to the pledged word we have 
given them. We must let them know — that we as Canadians living under the 
British flag, are going to adhere to our word. 

W. E. Knowles, M.P. — Page 5812 — I look upon this Bill as a great peril. 
If we are to lay down the principle that a Government that is in power can go 
behind the Bill of Rights, and the principles of the Magna Charta, and can say 
"We believe we must be perpetuated and continued in power, and we will 
disfranchise people who would vote against us," then the democracy is destroy- 
ed, and any tyrant who \vould assume power m this country could continue to 
possess that power, if you are going to once allow the principle that he is to be 
able to dictate as to who will vote. 

Hon. Frank Oliver, M.P. — Page 5818 — I say that this Government is 

committing a crime against Canada in the legislation now before the House, a 
crime the effect of which may be more far-reaching than any man can now see.



D. D. McKenzie, M.P. — Page 5609 — Certain emissaries went froth from 
this country to the West to ask certain gentlemen to cast their lot with this 
Government and come under the Tory yoke. But, as they would not submit 
to the Tory yoke, as they would not come within the thraldom of Toryism, the 
next thing was to subject them to this law, to have them gagged, pilloried, 
outlawed. 

Hon. W, M. Martin, Premier of Saskatchewan, issued a statement from 
Regina, Dece'mber 8th, 1917-'of which the following are extracts: 

"In regard to the War-Time Elections Act, I have already expressed my 
opinion with respect to the disfranchisement of certain classes of our people. 
I regard this feature of the act as un-British and undemocratic, calculated. to 
create distrust and suspicion and to delay the Canadianizing of many of these 
people for a generation. 

"Moreover, apart from the disfranchisement provisions of the Election 
act, machinery is created which in the hands of unscrupulous men may 
be used in such, a way as to win any constituency. This portion of the 
act renders possible the disfranchisement of any citizen living in Western 
Canada." 

The Right Hon. Sir Wilfrid Laurier in his election address issued on 
November 5th, 1917, dealt with the War Time Elections Act as follows:" 

"In order to be effective, to satisfy the public conscience and to secure 
that acquiescence in a verdict which should be the last word on all questions 
submitted to the people, a general election should be an appeal to the electorate 
such as it exists under the law. 

"The Government have discarded that fundamental principle of the 
institutions of a free people. They have designedly altered the sanctity of the 
franchise, by choking discussion, by ruthlessly using the closure, they have 
deliberately manufactured a franchise with which they hope to win a victory 
at the polls — a passing victory for themselves, a permanent injury to the coun- 
try. 

"This act known as the War Time Elections Act, is a blot upon every 
instinct of justice, honesty and fair play. 

"It takes away the franchise from certain denominations whose members 
from ancient times in English history have been exempt from military service, 
and who in Great Britain never were, and are not now, denied their rights of 
citizenship. 

"It takes away the franchise from men whom we invited to this country, 
to whom we promised all the rights and privileges of our citizenship, who 
trusted in our promises and who became under our laws, British subjects and 
Canadian Citizens. They are thus humiliated and treated with .contempt 
under the pretence that being born in enemy countries, in Germany and 
Austria, they might be biased in favour of their native country and against 
their adopted country. The assumption is falted in theory ard might easily 
be so demonstrated. It is sufficient to observe that it is also false in fact. 
There has not been any current of emigration from Germany go Canada during 
the last twenty years, and as to Austria, almost the total number, perhaps 
nine-tenths of the emigrants from that country, were not from Austria proper, 
but from those Slav- provinces held by force by Austria, and whose sympathies 
are strong and deep against her, and for the Allies. 



"It gives the franchise to some women and denies it to others. All those 
whose privilege it is to have near relatives amongst the soldiers will be voters. 
The right will be refused to all those not so privileged, though their hearts are 
just as strong in the cause, and though they have worked incessantly for it. 
Moreover, in five provinces of the Dominion, namely, Ontario, Manitoba, 
Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia, women have been admitted to 
the franchise. According to the terms of the Dominion law, which no sophistry 
can blur, being electors in the province, women are electors in the Dominion. 
The act of last session snatches away that right from them. 

"The Act is vicious in principle, and is equally vicious in its enacting 
dispositions. We have in most of the provinces of the Dominion, a regular 
system of preparing the voters' lists and against that system no complaint has 
been heard during the last twenty years. That system is also cast aside and 
lists are to be prepared by an army of so-called enumerators, whose 
work must be done in haste, whose powers are arbitrary, with no useful 
checks to be exercised in due time, and with all doors wide open for 
errors, confusion and frauds. 

"Such legislation is repugnant to every sense of justice and right. It has 
for its object and for its effect to discourage and to stifle the fiee expression of 
the will of the people, and to make parliamentary government a mere name 
without a reality." 

On May 23rd, 191-8, in the House of Commons,. Sir Wilfrid Laurier moved 
that the War Time Elections Act be repealed, but the Borden Government 
voted this down and a new act or another enormity is from time to time men- 
tioned in the press as likely to be proposed by the Government. 




War-Time Elections Act, 1917. 



The Iniquity of 1885 Repeated in 1917. 



Thousands of English, Scotch, Irish, French and native born British 
Subjects and also naturalized British Subjects of non-German 
and non-Austrian blood were not allowed to vote. 

A dark blot of shame was cast upon Canada by the Borden Government 
passing the War-Time Elections Act, 1917, and newspapers supporting the 
Borden Government gleefully approved of it. (See Toronto Daily News 
Conservative, Saturday, March 23rd, 1918). 

Violation of Rights. 

From many quaiters, information has been obtained that the War Time 
Elections Act was used as it was intended to be used and that gross irregularities, 
many flagrant violations of the law, were systematically resorted to by returning 
officers, deputy returning officers, enumerators, candidates and agents of the 
Borden Government, amongst other violations of constitutional rights being 
the following: — 

1. That as a rule the enumerators kept no office, that it was difficult to 
locate them, that they left off names of thousands of persons, English, French, 
Irish, Scotch and native born British Subjects and also naturalized British 
Subjects of non-German and non-Austrian blood and others qualified to vote, 
and left them off even after their attention had been called to the fact that such 
persons were entitled to vote, and that the names of persons actually on the 
But as published weie subsequently removed by the enumerators. 

Prussian Methods. 

2. That the Deputy Returning Officers refused to allow persons to vote 
on certificate. 

3. That the D.R.O's acted as if they were the election agents of the Borden 
Government and challenged the right of persons to vote who were likely to vote 
Liberal. 

4. That without regard to nationality, language or place of birth, 
persons, although naturalized, were not permitted to vote because of the fact 
that they were born in Norway *or other European country of which Germany 
or Austria had nothing to do. 

5. That subject races of non-German or non- Austrian blood born in ter- 
ritory taken by Germany or Austria but opposed to Prussianism both in Europe 
and in Canada and naturalized previous to April 1st, 1902, were not permitted 
to vote, although even the nol&rious Act did not disqualify them. 

6. That persons of European blood, although born in Canada, were not 
allowed tojvote. 


7. That Americans naturalized in Canada were not allowed to vote. 

8. That persons were known to have voted more than once. 

9. That the names? of women and other persons not entitled to vote were 
placed upon the li.jt. 

10. That the names of Indian women were impioperly placed on the fist 
and these squaws, as- at Southampton, North Biuce, Ontario, voted for the 
Borden candidate. 

11. That the Returning Officer refused to supply the lists of enumerators 
to the Liberal candidates, and even native born British subjects of British blood 
were not allowed to vote. 

12. That sufficient ballois were not supplied at the polls and polls were 
placed in inconvenient localities. 

Fooled The Soldiers. 

13. That it was suggested to returned soldiers in hospitals or elsewhere 
or soldiers in training that in regard to paragraphs 6, 7 and 8 in Form B of the 
Military Voters Act regarding residence at the time they enlisted that they 
answered by stating "I cannot say" and thus allow a further suggestion to be 
made that they designate a riding in which the Government agents wished their 
vote to be counted. 

14. That discharged soldiers who under section 10 of the Military Voteis 
Act were entitled to vote "as an elector of the polling district therein he is a 
resident at the time of polling" were requested to move for the day of the 
election to-a riding where their vote would be useful when such sojourn is not 
residence within the meaning of the law. 

15. That thousands of telegrams, letters, copies of papers, speeches, etc., 
were sent out by persons acting on behalf of the Government, and the Govern- 
ment itself issued an official statement promising exemption from Military 
service without regard to the procedure set forth in the Act. Thousands were 
exempted for election purposes and four months after many of these exemp- 
tions were cancelled. 

16. That cables or telegrams were tampered with as for example a soldier 
cabled "Home Christmas" and when the cable was delivered it read "Home 

Christmas. Vote Union Government." 

17. That the fathers, mothers and other relatives of soldiers overseas were 
promised to have their boys home for New Year's Day 1918 or shortly after- 
wards if these mothers, fathers and other relatives would vote for the Borden 
Candidates. 

18. That the Canadian soldiers in Great Britain and in the trenches voted 
under the Military Voters' Act and in the hands of the officials it was more 
deadly than the War Time Elections Act. (See debates in Parliament as 
reported in Hansard, May 1918.) 

19. That improper suggestions had been made regarding the disposal 
of the patriotic fund and other war time efforts put forth by the people as a 
whole without regard to political views. 




PROVINCIAL PREMIERS, MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT, AND 
SENATORS. 

The foregoing is issued on behalf of the National Liberal Convention 
Committee. The Committee is composed of the following: — 

D. D. McKenzie, M.P., North Sydney, Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, Chair- 
man; Senator Hewitt Bostock, Ducks, B.C.; Senator W. C. Edwards, Ottawa; 
Senator N. A. Belcourt, Ottawa; W. H. White, M.P., Alberta; Dr. J. P. Malloy, 
M.P., Manitoba; Hon. Charles Murphy, M.P., Ottawa; D. C. Ross, M.P., 
Strathroy, Ont.; I. E. Pedlow, M.P., Renfrew, Ont.; Hon. R. Lemieux, M.P., 
Montreal, Que.; James A. Robb, M.P., Chateauguay-Huntington, Que.; 
E. B. Devlin, M.P., Wright County, Que.; F. S. Cahill, M.P., Pontiac, Que.; 
Dr. J. E. Fontaine, M.P., Hull, Que.; Ernest Lapointe, M.P., Kamouraska, 
Que.; L. J. Papineau, M.P., Bauharnois, Que.; and Hon. John Oliver, Premier 
of British Columbia,; Hon. Chas. Stewart, Premier of Alberta, Hon. W. M. 
Martin, Premier of Saskatchewan, Hon. T. C. Norris, -Premier of Manitoba, 
Hon. Sir Lomer Gouin, Premier of Quebec, Hon. W. E. Foster, Premier of 
New Brunswick, Hon. Geo. H. Murray, Premier of Nova Scotia, Mr. J. H. 
Bell, leader of the Liberal Opposition in Prince Edward Island, and William 
Proudfoot, K.C., M.P.P., Toronto, Ont.